Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you will People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot off connection in the people mating. Overview of General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal regarding Social Circumstances, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technology you to definitely minimizes societal engagement and you may emotional well-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, timing, and you may duration of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Newest Populace Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis of intimacy, interests, and commitment: Investigations new assumptions of one’s triangular concept out of like. Psychological Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling finest in the undertaking bad: Social evaluations in this close relationship. Log away from Character and you may Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit cognition regarding romantic competition. Log out-of Identity and you will Social Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you can relationship repair components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to glamorous options: The latest advanced mindset from relationships repairs. Development and you will Person Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation out-of disagreement and agreement when you look at the disappointed and you may nondistressed marital lovers. Journal away from Contacting and you will Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A great., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation on the web: What’s the big interest? Journal out of Personal Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.
The many benefits of confident illusions: Idealization therefore the design away from fulfillment into the personal relationships
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review aim during the close matchmaking: A style of global enhancement and you can specific confirmation. In P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents regarding the examination of couples communication (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the https://getbride.org/da/blog/canadiske-kvinder-vs-amerikanske-kvinder/ consumer-therapist thread from contact out of accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Principle, Search, Habit, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Brand new social monitoring program: Increased sensitiveness so you’re able to social signs just like the an adaptive reaction to social different. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The new personal outcast: Ostracism, public exception, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Push.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Worldwide and certain relational designs from the connection with social relations. Diary out-of Identification and you will Societal Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Connection and advice trying in intimate dating. Character and you may Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular attachment representations during the adulthood: Can there be a relationship?. Log Of Personal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal dating: Restoration and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection truly impression certainly one of partners while the a function of the resemblance in their mutual skills. Identification And you can Personal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out-of extrinsic perks into liking and you can loving. Record out of Identification and Personal Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.