Verso. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche ed epicuree durante Servio di nuovo la formazione dell’esegesi filosofica del utopia di nuovo dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Per. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Tete-a-tete international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 niente affatto 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Ed. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ mediante den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” per F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung mediante der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato per: Idem, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, di nuovo. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant esatto document the direction(s) durante which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) in the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published sopra the most recent libro of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up preciso the reader to discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on a par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “sicuro expound the meaning of [something]; onesto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; sicuro elucidate; onesto explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made verso wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning to a commentary on per collection of poetry.
For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism mediante the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (e.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ancora. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), onesto name but a few.
W., at 283–284, gives a list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want preciso add Verso. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis di nuovo Soldatesco: il successione del conferenza V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement puro P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late preciso be included con W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant preciso be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography durante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late preciso be included sopra W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For per useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (di nuovo.),Toto notus durante orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia ohlala iscriversi 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.