The new mating games: A good primer for the like, gender and you may wedding (next Ed
Rhoades G. K., Stanley S. Yards., ). This new pre-involvement cohabitation impact: A duplication and expansion regarding prior results. Diary out-of Family members Psychology, 23, 107-111.
Rhoades G. K., Stanley S. Meters., ). A great longitudinal study away from connection personality during the cohabiting relationships. Record out-of Members of the family Items, 33, 369-390.
Rindfuss Roentgen. R., VandenHeuvel A good. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to relationships or a substitute for are single? Populace and you will Creativity Feedback, 16, 703-726. http:// dx.doi.org/963
Rusbult C. Age. (1980)mitment and you may satisfaction within the romantic relationships: An examination of the Investment Model. Journal of Fresh Societal Therapy, sixteen, 172-186.
Schoebi D., Karney B. Roentgen., Bradbury T. Letter. (2012). Stability and alter in the 1st ten years out of marriage: Does commitment confer positives outside of the ramifications of fulfillment? Log away from Identification and you may Social Psychology, 102, 729-742.
Scott S. B., Rhoades Grams. K., Stanley S. M., Allen Elizabeth. S., ). Things about separation and you may memories from premarital intervention: Ramifications to possess boosting relationship degree. Few and you will Family relations Mindset: Lookup and practice, dos, 131-145. org//a0032025
Segars A good. H., Grover V. (1993). Re-investigating identified simpleness and you will usefulness: A good confirmatory grounds research. MIS Every quarter, 17, 517-525. 249590
Seltzer J. An effective. (2004). Cohabitation in the us and you may Great britain: Demography, kinship, and upcoming. Log regarding ily, 66, 921-928. org//j.0022-dos.x
Stanley S. Yards. (2003, November). Evaluating couple and you may relationship dating: Past function and you will into a much deeper expertise in means. (more…)