Regardless if plaintiff you can expect to experience for example a state, however, their particular pleadings nevertheless falter, because the her allegations is vague and you will conclusory
As the plaintiff is not a federal government certified or personnel, and since defendants don’t file encumbrances contrary to the debated possessions due to the fact retribution for authoritative governmental responsibilities, plaintiff don’t county a legal claim to possess incorrect burden.
As stated in the Opinion, the fact that these documents were recorded in Lane County does not establish that they were in anyway invalid. Opinion at 21. Plaintiff does not explain how these documents are “defective”; as such, plaintiff cannot state a claim for relief because she dose not allege “sufficient . . . underlying facts” in support of her claim. Starr, 652 F.3d at 1216.
Moreover, plaintiff’s assertion that defendants had knowledge of the allegedly invalid encumbrances “because they each had persons in their employ who . . . create[d] fictitious documents” is similarly vague and conclusory. Thus, plaintiff is again merely asserting the elements of a claim, without identifying any particular facts entitling her to relief. Find Or. Rev. Stat. (“[a]ny person who knowingly files, or directs another to file, an invalid claim of encumbrance shall be liable to the owner of the property”). (more…)