Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, Fairburn CG
forty eight. Pursey K, Burrows TL, Stanwell P, Collins Ce. Just how accurate is net-created worry about-said height, pounds, and the body bulk index when you look at the teenagers? J https://datingmentor.org/tr/waplog-inceleme/ Med Web sites Res. (2014) 16:e4. doi: /jmir.2909
forty-two. Beasley TM, Schumaker Re. Several regression method to analysing contingency tables: Blog post hoc and organized comparison actions. J Exp Educ. (1995) –93. doi: 797
fifty. Culbert Kilometres, Racine SE, Klump KL. Look comment: what we should have learned in regards to the factors behind food conditions – a synthesis of sociocultural, mental, and you may physiological look. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (2015) –64. doi: /jcpp.12441
51. Oldham M, Robinson E. Graphic body proportions norms and also the around-detection away from obese and you may being obese. Obes Sci Pract. (2018) 4:29–40. doi: /osp4.143
52. Robinson E, Parretti H, Aveyard P. Graphic identity regarding being obese from the healthcare positives: a fresh examination of trainee and you may certified GPs. Br J Gen Pract. (2014) 64:e703–8. doi: /bjgp14X682285
53. Robinson Age, Kersbergen I. Fat or about best? a norm review need out-of detected pounds standing. Obes Sci Pract. (2017) 3:36–43. doi: /osp4.89
54. Ruhl R, Peterson JL, Luedicke. Motivating otherwise stigmatising? personal attitudes off lbs-relevant vocabulary used by wellness organization. Int J Obesity. (2013) –19. doi: /ijo.
55. Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory: Into facts ladies’ existed experience and you can mental health dangers. Psychol Women Q. (1997) –206. doi: /j.1471-.tb00108.x
56. Moraldi B. Approaching intercourse and you may culture assortment for the looks image: Objectification theory as the a construction to own integrating concepts and you may grounding lookup. (more…)